🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably can't establish limits at democracy," commented a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding placards against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.