🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the World Series did not happen during the tense finale on Saturday, when her squad pulled off one death-defying escape feat after another and then winning in extra innings over the opposing team.

It happened a game earlier, when two second-tier players, Kike Hernández and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a electrifying, game-winning play that at the same time challenged many harmful stereotypes touted about Latinos in recent decades.

The moment in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to catch a ball he initially lost in the stadium lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, game-winning play. the second baseman, at second base, caught the ball moments before a opposing player barreled into him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not just a great athletic moment, perhaps the key shift in momentum in the team's direction after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a badly needed uplift for the community and for Los Angeles after months of immigration raids, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a constant drumbeat of negativity from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy presented this counter-narrative," said Molina. "The world saw Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a different kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It is so simple to be demoralized these days."

However, it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter nowadays – for her or for the many of other Latinos who show up faithfully to matches and fill up as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand spots per game.

The Complicated Relationship with the Organization

When intensified enforcement operations started in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were sent into the area to react to resulting protests, two of the local sports clubs quickly issued statements of solidarity with affected communities – but not the baseball team.

Management has said the organization prefer to stay away of politics – a view influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a significant minority of the supporters, even some Hispanic fans, are followers of certain leaders. After significant external demands, the team later committed $one million in support for individuals directly impacted by the operations but issued no official criticism of the administration.

White House Visit and Past Legacy

Three months before, the team did not hesitate in accepting an offer to mark their previous championship victory at the White House – a decision that sports writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", considering the team's pride in having been the first professional franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular invocations of that legacy and the values it embodies by executives and current and former athletes. A number of team members such as the coach had voiced reluctance to travel to the White House during the initial period but either reconsidered or succumbed to demands from the organization.

Business Ownership and Supporter Conflicts

A further issue for fans is that the team are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released balance sheets, include a share in a private prison corporation that runs enforcement centers. Guggenheim's executives has said many times that it aims to stay out of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to certain agendas.

These factors contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Latino supporters in especial – sentiments that emerged even in the excitement of this season's hard-won championship victory and the following outpouring of team support across the city.

"Can one to support the Dodgers?" area columnist one observer reflected at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful article pondering on "team loyalty in our veins, but doubt in our hearts". Galindo couldn't ultimately bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still felt strongly, to the point that he decided his personal boycott must have brought the squad the luck it required to win.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Many supporters who share similar reservations seem to have concluded that they can continue to back the team and its roster of international players, including the Japanese megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his athletes but jeered the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in suits do not get to claim our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Past Context and Community Impact

The issue, though, runs deeper than only the team's current owners. The agreement that brought the former franchise to the city in the 1950s involved the city demolishing three working-class Latino neighborhoods on a elevated area above the city center and then selling the land to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 album that documents the story has an low-income worker at the stadium stating that the home he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, possibly southern California most influential Latino columnist and broadcaster, sees a darker side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the team and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.

"They have put one arm around Hispanic followers while profiting from them with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the team over its lack of response to the raids were upended by the awkward fact that turnout at matches did not dip, even at the height of the protests when downtown LA was subject to a evening curfew.

Global Players and Community Connections

Separating the team from its corporate owners is not a easy task, {